I read Harvey Penick's "Little Red Book" 17 years ago, and in it he says words to the effect that "if you just take ONE thing from this book, let it be this - TAKE DEAD AIM for every shot, let me say it again, TAKE DEAD AIM"
So I've always remembered that and I always do what Justin Rose does, ie hold the clubshaft to make a line from target to ball and then pick a spot 2 feet in front of the ball on every shot.
I'm not very accurate and probably have a 50/50 chance of hitting a green with an 7 iron, but while practising my wedges the other day I found that I was a hell of a lot more accurate if I didn't line up so obsessively but just stood over the ball and roughly aimed from my address position. This was true for all my short irons and chips from around the green, it was nearly always more accurate if I didn't line everything up.
How can this be?
Do you think I'm more subconsciously target orientated and therefore more accurate when I don't aim "mechanically"?
I know I am almost certainly NOT lined up correctly when I aim roughly (because I know that from address it looks like I am aiming wrongly when I go through the mechanical routine, if that makes sense) but it seems to produce better results.
But the opposite is true with putting - does anybody draw a line round the ball and then use it to line up their putts - and if so, when you stand over it ready to putt, does it look like it's going to miss? I do this too, and it looks "wrong" at address but I KNOW it's not so I go with it I'm happy with my putting, the majority of my misses are misreads, not inaccurate putts, and I will miss 99% of the time if I stray from trusting that line.
I suppose my putting stroke is mechanically sound and my full swing is less so?
So I've always remembered that and I always do what Justin Rose does, ie hold the clubshaft to make a line from target to ball and then pick a spot 2 feet in front of the ball on every shot.
I'm not very accurate and probably have a 50/50 chance of hitting a green with an 7 iron, but while practising my wedges the other day I found that I was a hell of a lot more accurate if I didn't line up so obsessively but just stood over the ball and roughly aimed from my address position. This was true for all my short irons and chips from around the green, it was nearly always more accurate if I didn't line everything up.
How can this be?
Do you think I'm more subconsciously target orientated and therefore more accurate when I don't aim "mechanically"?
I know I am almost certainly NOT lined up correctly when I aim roughly (because I know that from address it looks like I am aiming wrongly when I go through the mechanical routine, if that makes sense) but it seems to produce better results.
But the opposite is true with putting - does anybody draw a line round the ball and then use it to line up their putts - and if so, when you stand over it ready to putt, does it look like it's going to miss? I do this too, and it looks "wrong" at address but I KNOW it's not so I go with it I'm happy with my putting, the majority of my misses are misreads, not inaccurate putts, and I will miss 99% of the time if I stray from trusting that line.
I suppose my putting stroke is mechanically sound and my full swing is less so?
Comment