Louie Oosthuisen

[keiko]

Re: Louie Oosthuisen

I've seen your swing; wow you have alot to work on before trying to critique a pro at the level of Oosthuisen.

Where did I degrade his swing keiko? I merely point out the characteristics of his swing and then go on to say it's a VERY good swing.

Please take a bit more care to read my post before reacting to it. I think you may have simply overlooked the part where I said it's a very good swing.

[Ringer]

Re: Louie Oosthuisen

Keiko I was being very cordial with my comments and you have decided to go the route of ad hominem attacks. Because of that I fear that any further discussion with you about this will result bad consequences. Therefor I am going to ignore your attacks and invest my time into greater discussions.

[BrianW]

Re: Louie Oosthuisen

Hey Guys!

Please can you both agree to disagree and leave it there, thanks. It's an interesting thread and will continue to be so if we can debate his skills in a more detached manner.

Thank you.

[kbp]

Re: Louie Oosthuisen

No question Oosthuisen tends to have his weight biased toward the balls of his feet. On the downswing and through impact he’s often planted on the ball of his front foot. Many times his front foot heel doesn’t hit the ground until after impact. THIS IS A SIMPLE OBSERVATION. If someone considers this a fault or not a fault, then they are the one’s criticizing his swing and the judgement is on THEM.

Other debatable CHARACTERISTICS of his swing appear to be a deliberate so-called early wrist set and a right arm "hit" through impact.