Re: Dave Pelz - best tip....
Steve,
I appreciate your opinion. Different things work for different people. That is the great, and frustrating thing about golf, there is no "one answer". There are many paths to greatness, or Hogan, Nicholas and Palmer would have swung the same way!
My problem was just the opposite of yours, I've had a couple of lessons from PGA pros and was very dissapointed. I have read enough about the golf swing to be able to "converse" in the theory, I also used to teach another form of sport/movement for 30 years, so I know the teaching of physicality pretty well. These pros said some of the strangest things, and it was obvious to me that they were feeding me some "cookie-cutter" technique that they gave to the guy they saw 10 minutes before. It scared me off teaching pros for awhile, and I just stuck with trying to figure my own problems out.
I finally found a pro that some people at my range recommended, a Korean gentleman, who got it right. A half hour with him and I had 8 things to work on that were about "me" and not about someone else's swing. And they worked too! Only one thing he said was controversial, (compared to conventional theory) and that was, I'm sure, to fix a specific fault I had. Harvey Pennick might not agree with his piece of advice, but it cured my problem.
I was lucky I found a good pro, but I've sensed there are a lot of golf instructers churning out lessons as if everyone was the same. And many of these folks don't want to teach the short game. They focus on the long clubs on the range. Look at the DVD/videos. Unless the short game is in the title, they give 10-20% of the video time to inside 100 yards. In my case, my mind seems to work like Dave Pelz' because I get his theory and see why it should work for me. Sure, he's sometimes really boring in how he proves things work, but at least I know exactly where he's coming from, and can then "think for myself" when working on he system. If an instructor tells you to use a quicker wrist cock, but doesn't tell you why, then you can't figure it out when he's not there and it goes wrong.
An example is Marshall Smith's book "A Lifetime of Lessons". It is a confusing book for me. He gives you a tip, but doesn't really explain why it should be done that way and what it avoids, etc. I thought I'd get a lot more out of his book, but didn't.
As to putting, I think the arc style of stroke has been the recent popular form of theory. But it wasn't always that way! I remember learning putting from Arnie, and he still believes in a straight follow-through to the hole with the putter head (in-line stroke).
So, to each his own. I just hope most golfers get the chance to find the right teacher for them before they get frustrated and quit.
Steve,
I appreciate your opinion. Different things work for different people. That is the great, and frustrating thing about golf, there is no "one answer". There are many paths to greatness, or Hogan, Nicholas and Palmer would have swung the same way!

My problem was just the opposite of yours, I've had a couple of lessons from PGA pros and was very dissapointed. I have read enough about the golf swing to be able to "converse" in the theory, I also used to teach another form of sport/movement for 30 years, so I know the teaching of physicality pretty well. These pros said some of the strangest things, and it was obvious to me that they were feeding me some "cookie-cutter" technique that they gave to the guy they saw 10 minutes before. It scared me off teaching pros for awhile, and I just stuck with trying to figure my own problems out.
I finally found a pro that some people at my range recommended, a Korean gentleman, who got it right. A half hour with him and I had 8 things to work on that were about "me" and not about someone else's swing. And they worked too! Only one thing he said was controversial, (compared to conventional theory) and that was, I'm sure, to fix a specific fault I had. Harvey Pennick might not agree with his piece of advice, but it cured my problem.
I was lucky I found a good pro, but I've sensed there are a lot of golf instructers churning out lessons as if everyone was the same. And many of these folks don't want to teach the short game. They focus on the long clubs on the range. Look at the DVD/videos. Unless the short game is in the title, they give 10-20% of the video time to inside 100 yards. In my case, my mind seems to work like Dave Pelz' because I get his theory and see why it should work for me. Sure, he's sometimes really boring in how he proves things work, but at least I know exactly where he's coming from, and can then "think for myself" when working on he system. If an instructor tells you to use a quicker wrist cock, but doesn't tell you why, then you can't figure it out when he's not there and it goes wrong.
An example is Marshall Smith's book "A Lifetime of Lessons". It is a confusing book for me. He gives you a tip, but doesn't really explain why it should be done that way and what it avoids, etc. I thought I'd get a lot more out of his book, but didn't.
As to putting, I think the arc style of stroke has been the recent popular form of theory. But it wasn't always that way! I remember learning putting from Arnie, and he still believes in a straight follow-through to the hole with the putter head (in-line stroke).
So, to each his own. I just hope most golfers get the chance to find the right teacher for them before they get frustrated and quit.
Comment