I'm writing this because I have to. I've played golf with my Dad for 25 years and we have been having this argument for the last 15 years or so. It's about luck in golf. According to him, golf is a lucky game. You can't get a good score if you don't get lucky breaks. How you play or hit the ball as no meaning. Luck decides what score you get.
This is what he says:
Golf is a lucky game
Any Pro needs luck to win a tournament.
Good scores are just the result of good luck
Bad scores are just the result of bad luck.
He has a handicap of 21 because "he isn't lucky enough as a person" to play golf.
I think all of that is utter rubbish. Of course you get lucky bounces or unlucky bounces but at the end of the round it evens out. Anybody can play well, hit the ball great and get a great score without any luck at all. On the other hand it is rare to get a bad score due to bad luck alone. I've had lucky holes and good breaks but it's not the sole deciding factor on what your score will turn out to be. Of course blaming bad luck is an easy excuse for bad play and you see alot of players using this.
As you can imagine my Dad's theory is really annoying me and often off- putting on the golf course. He usually drives and shouts "That's right, get in the bunker". Then you get a rant about been unlucky etc only to find the ball didn't go in the bunker. I do iron shots that finish 3 feet away and all he says his "that was lucky, because the ball could have bounced sidewoods. You needed that bit of luck for your ball to finish close"
As I've already said this argument as been going on for more than a decade and I'm finding it really annoying.
As anybody got any comments about this ?
I'll be really interested to read them.
This is what he says:
Golf is a lucky game
Any Pro needs luck to win a tournament.
Good scores are just the result of good luck
Bad scores are just the result of bad luck.
He has a handicap of 21 because "he isn't lucky enough as a person" to play golf.
I think all of that is utter rubbish. Of course you get lucky bounces or unlucky bounces but at the end of the round it evens out. Anybody can play well, hit the ball great and get a great score without any luck at all. On the other hand it is rare to get a bad score due to bad luck alone. I've had lucky holes and good breaks but it's not the sole deciding factor on what your score will turn out to be. Of course blaming bad luck is an easy excuse for bad play and you see alot of players using this.
As you can imagine my Dad's theory is really annoying me and often off- putting on the golf course. He usually drives and shouts "That's right, get in the bunker". Then you get a rant about been unlucky etc only to find the ball didn't go in the bunker. I do iron shots that finish 3 feet away and all he says his "that was lucky, because the ball could have bounced sidewoods. You needed that bit of luck for your ball to finish close"
As I've already said this argument as been going on for more than a decade and I'm finding it really annoying.
As anybody got any comments about this ?
I'll be really interested to read them.
Comment