I read an article in which Tiger was interviewed about the continuing lengthening of courses to 'beat' the big hitters. He said 'I dont mind because I can hit it in the grandstands and it doesnt matter'
Is anyone else fed up of this attitude of the R&A and PGA to just keep making courses longer and longer? Rather than pernalise the long hitters it puts them in even stronger positions than say purer ball strikers. Faldo for instance wouldnt win anything now but he was the best iron striker I ever saw. Sure sometimes they cut the rough long but surely the answer is to introduce more OOB or penal trees/water etc for these guys who want to bomb it 350 off the tees. If you know it doesnt matter if youre 50 yards off line because the spectators will stop it anyway and theres always a line in to the holes whats the point .. 500 yard par 4's will be the norm soon rendering par an impossible score for most recreational golfers who dont have the time to pump iron for 6 hours a day
What else can/should they do instead of just adding length?
Is anyone else fed up of this attitude of the R&A and PGA to just keep making courses longer and longer? Rather than pernalise the long hitters it puts them in even stronger positions than say purer ball strikers. Faldo for instance wouldnt win anything now but he was the best iron striker I ever saw. Sure sometimes they cut the rough long but surely the answer is to introduce more OOB or penal trees/water etc for these guys who want to bomb it 350 off the tees. If you know it doesnt matter if youre 50 yards off line because the spectators will stop it anyway and theres always a line in to the holes whats the point .. 500 yard par 4's will be the norm soon rendering par an impossible score for most recreational golfers who dont have the time to pump iron for 6 hours a day
What else can/should they do instead of just adding length?
Comment