John Jacobs places great emphasis on the use of the arms in the golf swing.
So does Leslie King.
JJ claims that,in addition to positioning the club ready for the downswing the backswing also 'winds up the spring, and provides the power needed for long,straight shots.
LK proposes that the backswing has nothing whatsoever,absolutely nothing,to do with power. Its purpose is simply to put the club in the correct position ready for the downswing.
I know,from much of what I read,that a great deal of what is written about golf instruction is CONTRADICTORY.
Yet how can such two eminent teachers differ on such an important asspect of the swing? Comments please?
Vechietto
So does Leslie King.
JJ claims that,in addition to positioning the club ready for the downswing the backswing also 'winds up the spring, and provides the power needed for long,straight shots.
LK proposes that the backswing has nothing whatsoever,absolutely nothing,to do with power. Its purpose is simply to put the club in the correct position ready for the downswing.
I know,from much of what I read,that a great deal of what is written about golf instruction is CONTRADICTORY.
Yet how can such two eminent teachers differ on such an important asspect of the swing? Comments please?
Vechietto


Comment