Re: Still teachin Austinology...
Mike, I am glad your experience with Dan was a positive one.
As I stated, I studied the Austin method from both the Pieceriver video and the book "How to Kill the Ball"....I practiced daily and saw good results.
I was encouraged enough that I thought we might incorporate it into our instructional options at our two clubs. Which was why I took the trek out there.
My experience with Dan was unfortunately was not as good as yours, and he admitted he gave me wrong advice....granted I did only take three lessons...and I planned on more. But his advice tore my rotator cuff. So three lessons was all I was able to take due to his "mistake".
Please understand that prior to his bad advice Austinology and Dan were a subject of great debate in another golf forum where we are a sponsor...I defended the system and Dan for months...Dan and i exchanged emails and phone calls and arranged to get me out there, in person to defend him and the system.
I even purchased a SECOND book from Dan and gave it to our head pro, Larry Gladsen who was Zach Johnsons original instructor.
Everything was documented in daily reports to the forum...
From the moment we first met at Dan's practice facility where he showed me the picture on his wall of Ben Hogan and how Hogan was using the Austin system to the beginning instructional I already knew and performed well...to the unfortunate aftermath.
Before I posted the final results, I called Dan up and told him what had happened and all he could muster up was "Well, I didn't explain myself well".
Had he been a man of integrity, he could have offered to give me new lessons once I healed and fix the damage he'd done. Or even gone on line in that forum where he was contributing as well.
But he chose not to anything.
So, while you may say 3 lessons was insufficient time to make a decision, I say that three lessons, months of electronic and verbal communication, hundreds of dollars on lessons, thousands of dollars traveling to see him, medical bills, hundreds of hours in therapy, missing the final half of the season and countless hours of pain was a suitable price to pay to base a decision on.
While you and others may experience wonderful results from Dan, I was physically, financially and emotionally damaged by him...and he really didn't seem to give a damn.
In my book, a persons value and integrity is not measured when things are going well, it's when a person makes a mistake is his integrity and the principles that define him are made evident.
Dan proved himself to believe in a value system I do not condone and cannot support.
Originally posted by Surfmike
View Post
As I stated, I studied the Austin method from both the Pieceriver video and the book "How to Kill the Ball"....I practiced daily and saw good results.
I was encouraged enough that I thought we might incorporate it into our instructional options at our two clubs. Which was why I took the trek out there.
My experience with Dan was unfortunately was not as good as yours, and he admitted he gave me wrong advice....granted I did only take three lessons...and I planned on more. But his advice tore my rotator cuff. So three lessons was all I was able to take due to his "mistake".
Please understand that prior to his bad advice Austinology and Dan were a subject of great debate in another golf forum where we are a sponsor...I defended the system and Dan for months...Dan and i exchanged emails and phone calls and arranged to get me out there, in person to defend him and the system.
I even purchased a SECOND book from Dan and gave it to our head pro, Larry Gladsen who was Zach Johnsons original instructor.
Everything was documented in daily reports to the forum...
From the moment we first met at Dan's practice facility where he showed me the picture on his wall of Ben Hogan and how Hogan was using the Austin system to the beginning instructional I already knew and performed well...to the unfortunate aftermath.
Before I posted the final results, I called Dan up and told him what had happened and all he could muster up was "Well, I didn't explain myself well".
Had he been a man of integrity, he could have offered to give me new lessons once I healed and fix the damage he'd done. Or even gone on line in that forum where he was contributing as well.
But he chose not to anything.
So, while you may say 3 lessons was insufficient time to make a decision, I say that three lessons, months of electronic and verbal communication, hundreds of dollars on lessons, thousands of dollars traveling to see him, medical bills, hundreds of hours in therapy, missing the final half of the season and countless hours of pain was a suitable price to pay to base a decision on.
While you and others may experience wonderful results from Dan, I was physically, financially and emotionally damaged by him...and he really didn't seem to give a damn.
In my book, a persons value and integrity is not measured when things are going well, it's when a person makes a mistake is his integrity and the principles that define him are made evident.
Dan proved himself to believe in a value system I do not condone and cannot support.
Comment